Managing driving standards

 

 

An introduction to managing driving standards

 

home

find

overview of standard

overview of resources

overview of research

home

find

standard

resources

research

Use numbers to your advantage

Which of these approaches is the more useful?

Using numbers
Using anecdote

At 60 km/h with a reaction time of 0.75 seconds, and average deceleration of 0.6 G, a driver will stop a vehicle in 34 m. At 60 km/h a driver will chance a crash if another road user has the ability to enter 34 m of space in front of the vehicle.

They were only doing 60 km/h in a 70 zone. Mostly they're are pretty careful.

On average, drivers took 6.2 level two risks and 4 level three risks on each assessment.

They take a few risks but no more than other drivers in their position.

Emergency drives on average lasted five and a half minutes. Drivers took 3 or more level three risks in 31% of the responses.

You have to accept some risk on emergency cases. It's pretty rare that they crash. They must be doing reasonable well.

Twenty-eight per cent of personnel received traffic infringement notices for exceeding the speed limit. One employee received two in two weeks. On average, speeds were 12 km/h over the limit. In 80% of cases, the time of the offence was between 1800 and 2000hrs.

I know some of them occasionally get a ticket but its not enough to worry about.

61% of respondents answered that when personnel consider they need driver training the organisation does not help them get the training they need when they need it.

We have a great training branch. I suppose people are happy with the training they are getting.

58% of respondents indicated that personnel do not receive regular information and reminders about driving standards and issues.

We send out notices now and then and there is always info on the intranet.

The 'eco driver' averaged 15 L/100 km for a period of two months; 1.5mm of tyre wear; and 0.5 mm wear on the front brake pads. The average for employees driving identical vehicles performing the same range of duties was 17.5 L/100 km; 3 mm of tyre wear; and 0.8 mm wear on the front brake pads. We have a fleet of 23 vehicles: the potential savings in eco driving amount to $86 000 in twelve months.

Mostly they are reasonable drivers. They could probably treat the vehicles a bit better but I don't know if it would make that much difference. They do have a job to do and we are not that concerned about fuel costs.

42 crashes, 80% of which were manoeuvring incidents, occurred in a six-month period. On average, vehicles being repaired were off the road for five days. This amounts to 225 non-operational vehicle days.

We have a few crashes, nothing serious. We've got enough vehicles to cover those off the road. You have to take these sorts of things into account.

The oft-quoted words of Lord Kelvin more than adequately explain the message in the above table.

I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is a meager and unsatisfactory kind. It may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely in your thoughts advanced to the stage of science, whatever that matter may be.

Numbers will enhance your understanding of a problem - particularly when the numbers are large. Little things go unnoticed, but when little things combine they become meaningful.

AmbulanceDriving has several resources that will help you measure aspects of driving.

Resource

<

previous

An introduction to managing driving standards

next

>

|       copyright       |      DISCLAIMER       |      top of page      |